Annual joint plan with Local Public Health
This criterion assesses formal, annual joint planning with Local Public Health (Director of Public Health within the upper-tier Local Authority) or equivalent population health lead within the Integrated Care System (ICB/Place Partnership) and UKHSA Health Protection Team for health protection/outbreak matters. It operationalises Taʿāwun (cooperation) to achieve Maṣlaḥah (public welfare). The annual joint plan MUST cover: (a) at least one prevention/health improvement initiative aligned to JSNA/HWBS/Core20PLUS5, (b) a health protection/outbreak liaison protocol with UKHSA, and (c) agreed referral/escalation pathways into statutory services. Additional modules (e.g., vaccination, screening, mental health) are optional based on local need.
- Is there a formal, documented annual joint plan with the designated Local Public Health authority that meets the minimum scope (prevention, outbreak protocol, referral pathways)?
- Does the joint plan clearly define shared objectives, roles, responsibilities, and resource commitments for both parties?
- How does the organization monitor progress against the plan's objectives and measure the impact of joint initiatives?
- How was controller/processor status determined for each data flow, and is there a documented rationale?
- At the point of service, what is the confidentiality/consent script and what privacy information is provided?
- Can you show a completed referral journey map from first contact to statutory service acceptance/feedback?
- How are the outcomes and learnings from the joint plan systematically reviewed and used to improve future collaboration and community health outcomes?
- Can you provide examples of how the partnership has evolved from annual planning to influencing long-term, strategic public health priorities in the community?
- What formal MoU/SLA, DSA/Art.26, and DPIA are in place, and who are the Caldicott/IG leads?
- How does the plan align to the JSNA/HWB Strategy and ICS population health priorities/Core20PLUS5?
- What outcome indicators are set and how are results disaggregated by protected characteristics/Core20PLUS5?
- What joint risk/safeguarding assessments and outbreak protocols with UKHSA exist?
- The documented annual joint plan signed or formally agreed upon by both the organization and Local Public Health.
- Minutes from joint planning and review meetings.
- Jointly produced reports, impact assessments, or public communications related to the planned activities.
- Evidence of resource allocation (e.g., budget lines, staff time) dedicated to implementing the joint plan.
- Signed MoU/SLA with dispute resolution and exit clauses.
- IG Pack: Controller/Processor rationale, Art.26 arrangement (with essence statement) or Art.28 agreement, DPIA, updated privacy notice, RoPA entry.
- Joint risk/safeguarding register with controls and owners.
- EqIA/EDI analysis of planned initiatives.
- Quarterly review packs with RAG and outcome dashboards.
- Evidence of HWB/Place participation (minutes).
- DSPT statement of compliance (if delivering NHS/care services).
- Safeguarding escalation protocol and DBS/safer recruitment records.
| Level | Rating | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5/5 | Co-signed MoU; DSA/DPIA; 4/4 quarterly reviews; ≥85% actions green; ≥2 outcome targets met; equity gap narrows ≥5%; participation on HWB/Place board; evidence of influencing JSNA/HWBS (e.g., cited submission, minutes of adoption). |
| 4 | 4/5 | MoU; DSA/DPIA; ≥3/4 reviews; ≥75% green; ≥1 outcome met; equity data collected and analysed. |
| 3 | 3/5 | Annual plan signed; partial DSA or DPIA; ad-hoc reviews; some outcome proxies; limited equity data. |
| 2 | 2/5 | Contact without plan; no IG artifacts. |
| 1 | 1/5 | No engagement. |
Related Criteria
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Updated islamic_references from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.