CWE-CWR-30
Compassion, Welfare & Environment
Community Welfare & Relief
CORE
Excellence
v2.9.7
Taharah (Purity) Facilitation
Assesses the provision of clean, accessible, safe, and well-maintained ablution facilities for all stakeholders. Fulfilling this foundational requirement of Taharah upholds human dignity (karamah al-insan) and enables worship, reflecting a commitment to preserving faith (hifz al-din). It also adheres to the principle of 'no harm' (la darar wa la dirar) by ensuring facilities are safe and hygienic.
Assessment Questions
- How does the organization ensure the basic availability and functionality of ablution facilities for all stakeholders?
- What documented processes, such as cleaning and maintenance schedules, are in place to ensure the consistent cleanliness and hygiene of the facilities?
- How does the organization systematically gather, analyze, and act upon feedback to improve the quality and accessibility of its ablution facilities?
- Who is the named responsible person for taharah facilities, and how are risks/KPIs reported to senior leadership?
- What are the response-time SLAs for faults during peak times (e.g., Jumu’ah) versus standard hours?
- What data or technology does the organization use to proactively enhance the user experience and optimize resource management?
- In what ways do the ablution facilities reflect the principles of Iḥsān (excellence) and sustainability?
Evidence Requirements
- Documented cleaning and maintenance schedules and logs.
- Legionella risk assessment, written scheme, and temperature/flush logs.
- TMV service/maintenance certificates (where installed).
- Ablution area risk assessment and COSHH assessments for cleaning chemicals.
- Accident/near-miss records specific to slips/trips in wet areas.
- Photos or videos of the ablution facilities, including accessibility features.
- Evidence of a formal feedback mechanism and records of actions taken.
- Accessibility compliance reports or audits.
- Data reports on facility usage and resource consumption.
Scoring Guidelines
| Level | Rating | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5/5 | Excellent: Dedicated separate areas; Audit score ≥90%; User feedback ≥4.5/5; Full accessibility; Documented Legionella/TMV controls; Water efficiency features present. |
| 4 | 4/5 | Good: Functional and clean; Audit score 80-89%; Minor faults fixed <24h; Basic accessibility (step-free); Safety logs up to date. |
| 3 | 3/5 | Basic: Facilities available; Audit score 70-79%; Recurring minor maintenance issues; Cleaning logs exist but inconsistent; Accessibility partially met. |
| 2 | 2/5 | Inadequate: Audit score <70%; Frequent complaints; Missing consumables; Safety/Legionella records incomplete; Poor accessibility. |
| 1 | 1/5 | Non-compliant: No on-site provision and no documented alternative arrangement/signposting. |
Related Criteria
CWE-CWR-01 Weekly Dignified Food Support Service (Food Bank, Pantry, or Hot Meals)
CWE-CWR-02 Hardship-grant / zakāt emergency fund
CWE-CWR-03 Volunteer management: hours logging, safer recruitment & safeguarding
CWE-CWR-04 Partnerships with local authorities and community organisations (NGOs/VCSE)
CWE-CWR-05 User-impact survey results
Version
2.9.7
2025-11-05
Discussion (1)
Administrator
2026-03-07 12:06:28.933867
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Full import from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.