Skip to Content
CWE-ES-04 Compassion, Welfare & Environment Environment & Sustainability CORE Excellence v2.9.7

Water Conservation Measures Implemented

Evaluates implemented water conservation systems, a key indicator of fulfilling the *khilāfah* (trusteeship) by avoiding *isrāf* (waste). In Islamic jurisprudence, preserving vital natural resources aligns deeply with *maqāṣid al-sharīʿah* (objectives of Islamic law), specifically *ḥifẓ al-nafs* (preservation of life) and *ḥifẓ al-māl* (preservation of wealth). Furthermore, prophetic traditions strictly prohibit excessive water usage, even at a flowing river. Ultimately, this commitment to stewardship lowers operational costs, mitigates environmental impact, and strengthens trust with stakeholders who value resource preservation.

Assessment Questions
  1. How does the organization identify and address water wastage (isrāf) in its daily operations?
  2. What formal policies, targets, and monitoring systems are in place to manage and reduce water consumption?
  3. Describe the implementation of water-efficient technologies (e.g., low-flow fixtures, smart irrigation, recycling systems) across the organization's facilities.
  4. How does the organization benchmark its water conservation performance and use this data to drive continuous improvement and innovation?
  5. In what ways does the organization extend its water stewardship (khilāfah) principles to its stakeholders, such as suppliers, customers, and the wider community?
  6. How is the baseline defined and normalised for occupancy and irrigation/weather?
  7. What proportion of significant uses is sub‑metered and how is AMR data used (e.g., night‑line leakage)?
  8. If in leased premises, how are landlords engaged to access data and approve retrofits?
  9. Who is the named responsible person for water (policy owner + facilities lead) and how often do trustees review KPIs?
  10. How are exceptional events (Ramadan, camps, refurbishments, leaks) recorded and adjusted in baseline/normalisation?
  11. What assurance/verification is applied to meter data and audit findings (internal check or external audit)?
Evidence Requirements
  • Official water conservation policy and related communication materials.
  • Water utility bills and consumption data logs for the past 2-3 years (including bill validation checks).
  • Water balance diagram (inputs, sub-metered outputs/uses, losses) and Baseline & Normalisation Sheet.
  • Maintenance records for leak detection and repair.
  • Asset inventory or purchase orders for water-saving fixtures and equipment.
  • Project documentation and performance data for water recycling or harvesting systems.
  • Benchmarking reports comparing water usage against industry standards or set goals.
  • Evidence of stakeholder engagement initiatives related to water conservation (e.g., supplier guidelines, community programs).
  • Sub‑metering/AMR exports (12–36 months), night‑line leakage reports.
  • WRAS approval certificates/spec sheets for installed fittings; WaterSafe installer certificates.
  • Records of landlord approvals where relevant.
Scoring Guidelines
LevelRatingDescription
5 5/5 ≥20% reduction vs 12‑month, normalised baseline; ≥80% of fixtures low‑flow; sub‑metering covers ≥80% of significant uses; leak MTTR ≤48h; verified audit within last 24 months.
4 4/5 ≥10% reduction; ≥60% fixtures low‑flow; sub‑metering ≥50%; MTTR ≤72h. (Or equivalent progress via landlord engagement plan and verified partial data).
3 3/5 ≥5% reduction or intensity trend improving; some sub‑metering; partial tracking. (Or formal requests for data/retrofits with interim controls).
2 2/5 Measures installed but no verified reduction; minimal tracking.
1 1/5 No effort or rising consumption.

Discussion (1)

Administrator 2026-03-07 12:01:24.949658

📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Full import from mizan-297.json

Sign in to post a comment.