Curriculum reviewed & published
This criterion assesses whether the organization maintains a high-quality, documented curriculum that undergoes a rigorous, evidence-based review cycle and is responsibly published. It distinguishes between a 'Public Curriculum Pack' (outlines, intent, safeguarding) for transparency and an 'Internal Full Pack' (resources, schemes) for delivery. The process integrates strict accessibility standards (WCAG 2.2 AA), privacy-by-design (Children's Code, DPIA screening), and safeguarding compliance (DSL sign-off, Prevent, political impartiality). It anchors the process in the Islamic values of Amanah (trust in content accuracy), Tabayyun (verification of sources), and Shūrā (consultation), ensuring the curriculum continuously evolves to meet the needs of learners and the community.
- Do you have a 'Public Curriculum Pack' distinct from your internal resources?
- Can you provide the written SME report and Conflict of Interest declarations for the last review?
- Has the DSL signed off on the safeguarding and Prevent curriculum map this year?
- Where is your published Accessibility Statement and when was it last updated?
- Show evidence of how specific stakeholder feedback led to a curriculum change ('You Said/We Did').
- Standard Review Bundle (Agenda, SME Report, Change Log, Approval Minutes).
- Public Curriculum Pack (URL) and Internal Full Pack (Sample).
- Accessibility Statement and latest Accessibility Audit/Checklist.
- Privacy Publication Screening forms and DPIA records.
- Safeguarding/Prevent Map with DSL signature.
- Standards Mapping Table (e.g., vs National Curriculum).
| Level | Rating | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5/5 | Benchmark status: Comprehensive 'Public Pack' published, fully accessible (WCAG AA), rigorous external SME review with written reports, and data-driven continuous improvement loop evidenced. |
| 4 | 4/5 | Compliant: Well-developed curriculum with regular review, 'Public Pack' published with Accessibility Statement, DSL sign-off, and clear stakeholder feedback incorporation. |
| 3 | 3/5 | Basic: Documented curriculum exists with internal review and basic public outlines, but lacks formal SME reports, accessibility auditing, or rigorous safeguarding mapping. |
| 2 | 2/5 | Weak: Minimal documentation, ad-hoc review process, or public materials are inaccessible/outdated. |
| 1 | 1/5 | Non-compliant: No formal curriculum documentation or no review process. |
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Updated islamic_references from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.