Skip to Content
JTW-JME-08 Justice, Trade & Work Justice & Market Ethics CORE Excellence v2.9.7

Published fundraising cost allocation, fee disclosure, and solicitation statement policy

This criterion assesses whether the organization has developed and publicly disclosed a comprehensive policy serving three objectives: (1) Donor-facing transparency (raf‘ al-jahālah), (2) SORP-consistent accounting and cost allocation, and (3) legally compliant solicitation statements and third-party fundraiser controls. It evaluates the organization's commitment to ethical fundraising by openly communicating how costs are calculated, allocated, and reported. The policy defines ‘fundraising costs’ (direct, third‑party/agency fees, payment processing, platform fees), explains gross vs net recognition, and sets channel‑specific disclosure rules. It clarifies that ‘pricing’ refers to ticket/entry fees and suggested donation amounts, ensuring no hidden surcharges or coercive fee coverage options are applied.

Compliance 7
  • Documented cost allocation and fee disclosure policy (including solicitation statements)
    Documentation Essential
  • Event pricing/Gift Aid/VAT rule defined and applied
    Compliance Essential
  • Claims substantiation and qualifier control for '100%'/'admin-free' claims
    Compliance Essential
  • Consistency with financial reporting (SORP)
    Quality Essential
  • Maintain a register of all professional fundraiser/commercial participator agreements with trustee oversight
    Compliance Essential
  • Gross recognition of income and costs where fees are deducted by agencies/platforms
    Documentation Essential
  • Compliance with ICO PECR & UK GDPR for direct marketing
    Compliance Essential
Good 11
  • Public availability of the policy
    Process Essential
  • Minimum disclosure content matrix by channel
    Documentation Essential
  • Disclosure of fundraising expense ratios with defined formulas
    Performance Essential
  • Regular review and updating of the policy
    Monitoring Essential
  • Board approval of the policy
    Governance Essential
  • Case studies illustrating policy application
    Transparency Medium
  • Differentiated approaches for different fundraising channels
    Innovation High
  • Balance between transparency and simplicity
    Leadership High
  • Integration with broader ethical fundraising framework
    Excellence High
  • Mandatory staff/agency training and certification on the policy
    Stakeholder Engagement High
  • Use of standardized templates for solicitation statements
    Process Medium
Better 6
  • Benchmarking against sector standards
    Excellence High
  • Transparent reporting of actual vs. policy outcomes
    Transparency High
  • Educational components explaining rationale
    Stakeholder Engagement Medium
  • Stakeholder consultation in policy development (fulfilling ḥuqūq al-‘ibād)
    Stakeholder Engagement High
  • Routine sampling (pre‑ and post‑campaign) to test disclosure compliance and comprehension
    Monitoring High
  • Plain‑English, WCAG 2.2 AA accessibility, and translations
    Accessibility High

Discussion (1)

Administrator 2026-03-07 11:07:55.493210

📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Updated islamic_references from mizan-297.json

Sign in to post a comment.