Gender-Appropriate Sports & Fitness Programs
This criterion assesses the organization's provision of sports and fitness programs tailored to the specific needs and sensitivities of men and women, adhering to Islamic guidelines and UK law. It examines the availability, accessibility, and cultural appropriateness of these programs, ensuring equal opportunities for physical well-being while respecting Islamic values of modesty, privacy, and dignity. The assessment evaluates program design, facilities, instruction, and governance to ensure they cater to diverse community needs. It specifically addresses the removal of barriers (childcare, transport, cost), disability inclusion, and the lawful application of single-sex service exemptions under the Equality Act 2010. Rigorous compliance with safeguarding (DBS), health and safety (HSE), and data protection (GDPR) is integrated into the delivery model.
| Metric | Women-only session staffing compliance |
|---|---|
| Target | >= 95% |
| Frequency | Quarterly |
| Method | (# Women-only sessions with 100% female staff / Total women-only sessions) * 100 |
| Unit | Percentage |
Level 1: Initial/Ad-hoc
Ad-hoc & Unaware: No formal programs. Activities are sporadic and lack gender-specific design. No awareness of legal or religious compliance requirements.
Level 2: Developing
Aware & Basic: Basic activities offered (e.g., occasional walking group). Facilities shared with minimal privacy. Reactive approach to safety and safeguarding.
Level 3: Established
Defined & Structured: Regular programs with separate timings/spaces. Basic policies for modesty and privacy exist. DBS checks are done but without a structured matrix. Risk assessments are informal.
Level 4: Advanced
Managed & Compliant: Diverse programs based on needs assessment. Documented 'Single-Sex Services Decision Records' and 'Role-to-Check Matrix' for DBS are in place. Formal H&S (PAR-Q, EAP, PPM) and Privacy (CCTV policy, DPIA) controls are active. Barriers (childcare) are actively managed.
Level 5: Optimizing
Optimizing & Leading: Leader in inclusive, culturally sensitive fitness. Continuous improvement via health outcome data and independent audits. Innovative partnerships (NHS/Sport England). Achieves external accreditation (e.g., Clubmark). Governance is exemplary with Trustee-led risk oversight.
Organisation Types
By Organisation Size
| Size | Applicability | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Micro | exempt | Structured sports programs and formal Equality Act documentation (e.g., DPIAs, formal decision records) are disproportionate and generally not applicable to micro volunteer groups. |
| Small | partial | May run occasional fitness classes; requires basic justification for single-sex services under the Equality Act, but extensive documentation like DPIAs can be scaled down. |
| Medium | full | |
| Large | full | |
| Major | full |
Applicable When
- The organization offers sports/fitness programs.
- The organization promotes community physical health.
- The organization operates facilities where gender mixing is a consideration.
Not Applicable When
- The organization does not offer sports/fitness activities.
- Activities are exclusively religious/classroom-based with no physical component.
Related Criteria
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Full import from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.