Inclusive Cultural Programs & Representation
This criterion evaluates the organization's commitment to fostering an inclusive environment through its cultural programs, ensuring representation and accessibility for diverse community members. It assesses the extent to which the organization actively promotes intercultural understanding, celebrates diversity, and provides opportunities for individuals from various backgrounds to participate in and contribute to its recreational, artistic, and cultural activities. The focus is on eliminating barriers to participation (physical, digital, financial, sensory), addressing biases, and proactively creating a welcoming and equitable space. Furthermore, this criterion considers the organization's efforts to promote cultural sensitivity, respect, and understanding among its staff, volunteers, and participants, thereby enriching the overall community experience and strengthening social cohesion. The criterion also evaluates efforts to preserve and promote Islamic heritage and values within the cultural offerings while remaining sensitive to the diverse interpretations and expressions of faith (Adab al-Ikhtilaf) and compliant with data protection laws regarding special category data.
| Metric | Representation Parity Index |
|---|---|
| Target | ≤10 percentage points gap; Training ≥95%; Adjustment fulfilment ≥95%; Satisfaction gap ≤5 pts. |
| Frequency | Quarterly |
| Method | Sum over key characteristics of |program share − local community share|. Scope: Cultural/recreation events >15 attendees. Sample: n≥100/qtr. |
| Unit | Percentage Points |
Level 1: Initial/Ad-hoc
Cultural programs are ad-hoc and primarily reflect the culture of the organization's dominant demographic. There is no formal consideration of inclusivity or representation.
Level 2: Developing
The organization shows awareness of diversity and makes occasional efforts to include different cultural groups. Accessibility is considered on a case-by-case basis without a formal strategy.
Level 3: Established
A defined approach to inclusive programming exists. The organization systematically plans events that represent several key community demographics. Basic accessibility provisions are in place, and baseline data is gathered lawfully.
Level 4: Advanced
Inclusivity is integrated into the program planning lifecycle via an 'Inclusion by Design' checklist. Policies for adjustments, digital accessibility, and safeguarding are operational. Trustee oversight of EDI risks is established.
Level 5: Optimizing
The organization is a leader in fostering intercultural understanding. It proactively identifies and removes systemic barriers using comprehensive data and feedback. Programs are co-designed, highly accessible (WCAG 2.2 AA, BSL), and celebrated for deep Islamic authenticity and diversity.
Organisation Types
By Organisation Size
| Size | Applicability | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Micro | exempt | Formal 'Inclusion by Design' checklists, DPIAs for EDI monitoring, and dedicated review panels are disproportionately burdensome for volunteer-led groups. |
| Small | optional | Informal inclusion practices are encouraged, but formal checklists, DPIAs, and dedicated 'Shura' panels are not expected at this scale. |
| Medium | partial | Can implement basic inclusion checklists and use existing management committees for review, but full DPIAs for EDI monitoring may still be too complex. |
| Large | full | |
| Major | full |
Applicable When
- The organization offers recreational, arts, or cultural programs.
- The organization aims to serve a diverse community.
Not Applicable When
- Not applicable when activities are exclusively religious worship with no cultural/recreational programs. If any cultural/recreational components exist (e.g., heritage exhibitions, arts workshops, sports), apply this criterion to those components.
Related Criteria
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Updated islamic_references from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.