Board self-assessment published
Evaluating board governance, this metric assesses whether the board conducts an annual effectiveness self-assessment and transparently publishes a summary of the methodology, participation, key findings, and agreed improvement actions. It emphasises muḥāsabah (self-accountability), shūrā (consultative governance), and itqān (continuous improvement/proficiency), demonstrating stewardship (amānah) through learning, transparency, and fairness. By institutionalising these practices, the board upholds the Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah (objectives of Islamic law), specifically ensuring ḥifẓ al-māl (preservation of wealth) and reinforcing stakeholder trust through rigorous, ethical self-evaluation.
Compliance 1
-
GDPR: Privacy notice, retention, redactionCompliance Essential
Basic 1
-
Annual board evaluationProcess Essential
Good 6
-
Documented methodologyDocumentation Essential
-
Action plan with owners/timelinesGovernance Essential
-
Public summary in TAR and websiteTransparency Essential
-
Publication within 60 days or next TARTimeliness Essential
-
Board progress reviewMonitoring Essential
-
Pre-publication sensitivity review protocolRisk Management High
Better 7
-
Link to risk register and trainingProcess Essential
-
Periodic external facilitationContinuous Improvement Recommended
-
360-feedback for chair/committee chairsLeadership High
-
Stakeholder input sample with GDPR safeguardsStakeholder Engagement High
-
Public action-tracker progress updatesTransparency Medium
-
Plain-English summary & accessible web pageCommunication Medium
-
Succession planning integrationLeadership High
Best 2
-
External facilitation every 3 yearsLeadership High
-
Lessons-learned narrative publishedContinuous Improvement Medium
Related Criteria
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Updated islamic_references from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.