Board pledge "We did not solicit office"
This criterion assesses whether the organization's board members collectively make an annual public pledge affirming that they did not seek or campaign for their positions. It evaluates the commitment to servant leadership by reinforcing the Islamic principle that leadership (Wilayah) is a responsibility (Taklīf) rather than a privilege (Tashrīf). "Solicit/campaigning" includes canvassing for votes, offering inducements, coordinated vote drives, paid promotion, undue use of organizational resources, or pressuring nominators. This is distinct from CC9 'political campaigning'; this concerns internal governance. Where bylaws mandate elections, the pledge is adapted (Election Variant) to prohibit improper canvassing/inducements while permitting equal, official candidate statements. Transparency applies to the pledge and process—not to confidential allegation details.
Compliance 5
-
Breach protocol with minimum standards: (i) triage within 5 days, (ii) independent investigator, (iii) evidence standard, (iv) sanctions ladder, (v) SIR loggingGovernance Essential
-
Data protection & communications guardrails: published pledge must not reference individuals or allegations; complaints handled confidentially per GDPRGovernance Important
-
Confidential reporting/whistleblowing channel for campaigning concernsGovernance Essential
-
Serious incident assessment and reporting to the Charity Commission where applicableGovernance Essential
-
Annual training on integrity/anti-bribery for trusteesTraining Essential
Basic 5
-
Formal annual board pledge processProcess Essential
-
Collective public statementGovernance Important
-
Individual affirmation by all board membersProcess Essential
-
Documentation of pledge in board minutesDocumentation Essential
-
Ceremonial element to emphasize significanceLeadership Medium
Good 9
-
Public accessibility of the pledge (excluding sensitive allegation data)Governance Important
-
Candidate Briefing Pack issued to 100% of applicants/nominees, including definitions, examples, and sanctions; receipt acknowledgedProcess Essential
-
Pre‑shortlist Candidate Declaration: signed statement covering (a) no inducements/canvassing, (b) conflicts/relationships, (c) use of only official channelsProcess Essential
-
Integration with board appointment proceduresProcess Important
-
Regular review of pledge effectivenessMonitoring Important
-
Educational context explaining Islamic basis (Wilayah as Taklīf)Leadership High
-
Historical examples accompanying pledgeLeadership Medium
-
Regular board discussions on leadership ethicsContinuous Improvement High
-
Alternate Pledge (Election Variant) template used when member elections occurGovernance High
Better 8
-
Structured 15–20 minute reflection at the first post-AGM board, with prompts on Amānah, motives, conflicts, and stewardship; output a one-page anonymized summaryQuality Recommended
-
Integration with broader ethical frameworkLeadership High
-
Community witness to pledgeStakeholder Engagement High
-
Mentorship on servant leadership principlesLeadership High
-
Publish pledge and process on website within 30 daysTransparency High
-
Anonymous trustee pulse on leadership humility and undue influenceCulture Medium
-
Post‑cycle lessons‑learned review by Nominations CommitteeContinuous Improvement High
-
Publish an outreach plan and diversity monitoring for nominations to ensure the 'no solicitation' norm does not suppress participation from under‑represented groupsEquality, Diversity & Inclusion High
Best 2
-
Video/audio recording for transparencyTransparency Medium
-
Independent observer to witness pledge annually and sign assurance note confirming process integrityAssurance High
Related Criteria
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Updated islamic_references from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.