TS-BGS-21
Trust & Stewardship
Board Governance & Strategy
CORE
Compliance
v2.9.7
Ethical & Values-Based Decision-Making Framework
Assesses the application of a formal framework that embeds Shūrā (consultation), ʿAdl (justice), and Iḥsān (excellence) into strategic decisions. This process upholds Amānah (trust) by ensuring choices are just, value-driven, and consistently serve the best interests of all stakeholders and the organization's higher purpose, anchored by clear intention (Niyyah). Ultimately, this approach aligns leadership actions with Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah (objectives of Islamic law), actively promoting Maṣlaḥah (public benefit) while safeguarding against harm to fulfill profound moral accountability.
Assessment Questions
- Describe the formal framework or process used for strategic decision-making. How does it explicitly integrate the principles of Shūrā, ʿAdl, Iḥsān, and Niyyah?
- Provide a completed JEIA and stakeholder map for a recent major decision. What specific mitigations were adopted based on the 'La darar' test?
- Show evidence of conflict/related-party handling for a recent decision (Register entry, recusal, procurement controls) and any serious incident reporting considerations.
- Show evidence of the 10-day rationale communication (or documented redaction/exception log) and the Decision Register entry.
- How does the organization measure the effectiveness and fairness of its decision outcomes? Provide examples of metrics used to assess alignment with its higher purpose.
Evidence Requirements
- Documented decision-making policy/SOP with 'Major Decision' definitions.
- Decision Register export (with JEIA link, stakeholder mapping, COI section, comms log, and review outcome).
- Completed JEIA templates and bias checklists for recent major decisions.
- Minutes of meetings (Board/Exec) showing emergency ex-post reviews and COI declarations.
- Training register + assessment results (showing ≥80% pass rate).
- Redaction/Exception Log for stakeholder communications.
- Annual Ethics & Decisions summary in Trustees’ Report.
Scoring Guidelines
| Level | Rating | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 5/5 | Framework is comprehensive; KPI targets met (≥90% usage, ≥95% comms SLA); quarterly post-mortems conducted; annual Ethics summary published. |
| 4 | 4/5 | Framework used for all Major Decisions; KPI targets mostly met (≥80%); annual review conducted; JEIA and COI controls consistently evidenced. |
| 3 | 3/5 | Basic framework exists; used for most Major Decisions but documentation varies; JEIA/COI steps present but sometimes informal. |
| 2 | 2/5 | Decisions are made ad-hoc; informal ethical considerations; no formal JEIA or consistent COI logging. |
| 1 | 1/5 | No evidence of a structured ethical decision-making process. |
Related Criteria
Version
2.9.7
2025-11-05
Discussion (1)
Administrator
2026-03-07 11:07:44.893283
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Updated islamic_references from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.