Segregate and control Zakat vs Sadaqah (ledgers, banking, donor intent)
This criterion evaluates whether the organization maintains strict separation and control over Zakat and Sadaqah funds across ledgers, banking, and donor intent capture. For UK reporting, Zakat is treated as a restricted fund under Charities SORP (FRS 102). Minimum compliance requires segregated fund accounting within the General Ledger (GL), while separate bank accounts are best practice. Trusteeship requires safeguarding donors’ trusts by segregating Zakat from Sadaqah (Qur’an 23:8; 70:32) and ensuring collection is handled with integrity (Qur’an 9:103). Mixing funds leading to misapplication risks unjust consumption (Qur’an 2:188; 4:29). Additionally, Sadaqah may be restricted or unrestricted depending on donor terms; the system must capture that restriction separately from the ‘Zakat vs Sadaqah’ type to honour the covenant (Qur’an 5:1).
Zakāt Governance
Ensuring Zakat is collected from the rich and distributed to the eight specific categories of recipients as ordained.
Hifz al-Māl (Protection of Wealth)
Protecting the wealth of the Zakat fund for its designated recipients is a primary obligation. Segregating the funds is a critical mechanism for this protection.
Al-kharaj bil-daman
Liability accompanies benefit. Holding Zakat engages dhimmah; governance must ensure no benefit is taken without liability. Misposting/commingling creates liability risk.
Amānah
The sacred trust of ensuring that Zakat donations are managed and disbursed correctly to their intended beneficiaries.
Dhimmah (Accountability/Liability)
Once an organization accepts Zakat, its 'dhimmah' is engaged, meaning it is religiously and legally accountable for the funds.
Niyyah (Intention)
Donor designation reflects niyyah; the organization must capture and honour this intent with an auditable trail.
Related Criteria
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Updated islamic_references from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.