Project feedback reviewed and acted upon
Systematically reviews project feedback as a practice of muḥāsabah (self-audit) to fulfill its Amānah. This process demonstrates hisbah (accountability) by using stakeholder insights to drive continuous improvement, enhance program effectiveness, and build trust. It distinguishes between routine feedback, complaints, and whistleblowing, ensuring ethical conduct (consent, privacy, do-no-harm), safe channels, and a formal close-the-loop practice (“you said, we did”). It applies the principle of Sadd al-dharā’iʿ (blocking means to harm) by turning reactive complaints into preventative system changes.
Hisbah
Public accountability and structured oversight to prevent harm and improve benefit, involving systematic supervision and corrective action.
Muḥāsabah
The principle of self-audit and regular reflection to correct course, involving a disciplined cycle of review and improvement.
Sadd al-dharā’iʿ
Blocking the means to harm; using feedback trends to implement preventative controls before recurrence.
Shūrā
A principle of governance where affairs are conducted through mutual consultation.
Naṣīḥah
The religious duty of providing sincere counsel and feedback.
La darar wa la dirar
Feedback systems must avoid harm (privacy, coercion, retaliation) and include safe complaints/escalation routes.
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Updated islamic_references from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.