Water Conservation Measures Implemented
Evaluates implemented water conservation systems, a key indicator of fulfilling the *khilāfah* (trusteeship) by avoiding *isrāf* (waste). In Islamic jurisprudence, preserving vital natural resources aligns deeply with *maqāṣid al-sharīʿah* (objectives of Islamic law), specifically *ḥifẓ al-nafs* (preservation of life) and *ḥifẓ al-māl* (preservation of wealth). Furthermore, prophetic traditions strictly prohibit excessive water usage, even at a flowing river. Ultimately, this commitment to stewardship lowers operational costs, mitigates environmental impact, and strengthens trust with stakeholders who value resource preservation.
| Metric | Water Consumption Reduction and Intensity |
|---|---|
| Target | Default: ≥10% reduction within 3 years; ≥20% within 5 years OR achieve intensity ~1.5–3.0 L per wuḍū’ (depending on fixture type) without compromising validity. |
| Frequency | Quarterly review; annual assurance |
| Method | Primary: % reduction vs 12‑month baseline (normalised for occupancy and irrigation). Secondary: water intensity (L per visitor/student/FTE). If reporting L per wuḍū’, estimate events via sub‑metered volume ÷ counted users. |
| Unit | Percentage; L/person; L/m2; %; hours |
Level 1: Initial/Ad-hoc
Ad-hoc efforts to address obvious water wastage. No formal policy or system for water conservation exists.
Level 2: Developing
A basic water conservation policy is documented. Standard practices like fixing leaks and raising awareness are implemented, with initial efforts to track overall consumption.
Level 3: Established
Systematic approach with clear targets; ≥5% reduction vs normalised baseline; ≥50% fixtures low‑flow; sub‑metering for main wuḍū’ areas; monthly reporting and corrective actions. (Landlord-controlled: Formal data requests and interim controls).
Level 4: Advanced
Advanced systems (e.g., rainwater/greywater) integrated; ≥15% reduction vs normalised baseline; ≥70% fixtures low‑flow; sub‑metering covers ≥60% of significant uses; external benchmarking informs improvements. (Landlord-controlled: Engagement plan and verified partial data).
Level 5: Optimizing
Recognized leader: ≥25–30% reduction vs normalised baseline OR site‑level water‑positive (non‑potable sources ≥ total non‑potable demand); ≥90% fixtures low‑flow; ≥80% sub‑metering; engages suppliers on water risks (ISO 14046) and supports community access/stewardship (e.g., waqf fountains, local water projects). Evidence of public reporting and independent verification.
Organisation Types
By Organisation Size
| Size | Applicability | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Micro | exempt | Unlikely to own premises or have control over water fixtures; formal policies and audits are highly disproportionate. |
| Small | optional | Basic measures (e.g., fixing leaks) are encouraged if premises are owned, but formal tracking, policies, and biennial audits are disproportionate. |
| Medium | partial | Expected to track utility bills and implement practical measures (e.g., low-flow wudu fixtures), but formal biennial audits may still be resource-intensive. |
| Large | full | Fully applicable; resources permit formal tracking, quantifiable targets, and biennial audits across facilities. |
| Major | full | Fully applicable; expected to maintain robust environmental governance, comprehensive tracking, and formal auditing. |
Applicable When
- Organization operates physical facilities that consume water
- or has influence over premises via leasehold/estates arrangements with access to consumption data
Not Applicable When
- Organization operates solely online with no physical premises
- Premises where the organization has no access to water data and no contractual route to influence fixtures; in such cases, assess on engagement efforts with landlords.
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Full import from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.