Restorative-justice policy
This criterion assesses whether the organization has developed and implements a formal restorative justice (RJ) policy for addressing harms and conflicts. It evaluates the organization's commitment to justice approaches that focus on healing relationships, repairing harm, and addressing root causes rather than merely punishing offenders. Restorative processes are supplementary and never override safeguarding duties, statutory reporting, disciplinary action, or contractual/HR requirements. Where allegations meet safeguarding or serious incident thresholds, the organization prioritises protection, reporting, and investigation before considering restorative options.
Iṣlāḥ
The principle of reconciliation and restoration between disputing parties to achieve peace and harmony.
Sulḥ
The Islamic legal principle of an amicable settlement. It requires mutual consent, clarity of terms, and the removal of injustice (Zulm).
La darar wa la dirar
No harm and no reciprocating harm. This principle dictates that RJ must not be used if it risks further harm, coercion, or retraumatisation.
Adab al-qaḍā’
Etiquette of judgment/adjudication, emphasizing procedural fairness, hearing both sides, and avoiding bias.
Raḥmah
The concept of mercy, compassion, and grace, which is a fundamental attribute of Allah.
Iḥsān
Excellence and benevolence. Encourages conduct beyond mere justice (`Adl`), promoting proactive efforts to restore relationships.
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Full import from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.