Energy Efficiency Measures Implemented
Assesses whether the organization has implemented tangible measures to improve energy efficiency in its facilities, demonstrating a commitment to responsible resource use and reducing its carbon footprint. Includes both capital measures (retrofits) and operational controls (scheduling, setpoints, commissioning) aligned to actual occupancy patterns such as prayer/service timetables. These efforts reflect the Islamic duty of khilafah (stewardship) over the earth by actively avoiding israf (extravagance) in energy consumption, upholding the sacred amanah (trust) of environmental protection.
| Metric | Energy Consumption Reduction per sq ft |
|---|---|
| Target | ≥10% in 24 months; ≥30% by 2030 vs baseline |
| Frequency | Monthly (with annual assurance) |
| Method | ((Baseline consumption - Current consumption) / Baseline consumption) × 100 |
| Unit | Percentage |
Level 1: Initial/Ad-hoc
Initial Efforts: Energy conservation is practiced on an ad-hoc basis, driven by individual initiative rather than formal policy. Basic, low-cost measures may be in place (e.g., 'turn off lights' reminders).
Level 2: Developing
Defined Approach: A formal policy on energy efficiency exists. Specific, planned measures have been implemented in some areas (e.g., partial LED lighting upgrade). Basic energy consumption is tracked, but without formal targets.
Level 3: Established
Managed System: Audit-led programme with normalised (degree-day/occupancy) targets; sub‑metering of major loads; monthly performance reviews. Named energy manager and board ‘energy champion’ appointed; energy KPIs reported to trustees at least quarterly; energy efficiency actions costed and included in annual budget cycle.
Level 4: Advanced
Proactive Integration: Efficiency embedded in procurement (ETL/Energy Label), maintenance and seasonal commissioning, facility design standards (e.g., Passivhaus/BREEAM targets where viable), and green lease clauses. Lifecycle cost policy adopted (CapEx + OpEx) for energy-related purchases; formal approval route for projects with payback <3–5 years.
Level 5: Optimizing
Exemplary Stewardship: The organization is a recognized leader in energy efficiency, employing innovative technologies and potentially generating its own renewable energy. It actively shares best practices and influences its supply chain, demonstrating a profound commitment to its role as a steward (Khilāfah) of resources for the wider community's benefit (Maṣlaḥah). The Prophet (ﷺ) said: ‘The world is sweet and green, and Allah has appointed you as stewards over it…’ (Sahih Muslim 2742). Publishes assured energy and carbon data; influences suppliers via contract energy KPIs; pilots innovative controls/AI optimisation.
Organisation Types
By Organisation Size
| Size | Applicability | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Micro | exempt | Disproportionate for micro charities, which typically do not own premises or directly manage utility bills. |
| Small | partial | Can implement basic practical measures (e.g., LEDs) and monitor bills, but formal audits and complex re-baselining triggers are disproportionate. |
| Medium | partial | Expected to track consumption and implement efficiency measures, but formal external energy audits and strict re-baselining policies can be scaled down. |
| Large | full | |
| Major | full |
Applicable When
- Organization operates from physical premises
- Organization consumes energy (electricity, gas, etc.)
- If in leased/serviced premises with limited control, assess on ‘influence pathway’: green lease clauses, landlord engagement outcomes, sub‑metering requests, and procurement/behavioural controls within tenant control.
Not Applicable When
- Organization operates purely online with no physical presence and minimal energy consumption (e.g., single-person consulting business operating solely from home)
Discussion (1)
📋 **Version updated: 1.0.0 → 2.9.7** **Changes:** Full import from mizan-297.json
Sign in to post a comment.